← Search

Rose Creech

— year-end
37 matches · 24W–13L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Rose Creech to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2024-06-25 · TIA · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-10-08 · CP:Thunder:Raman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Naveen Prakash mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2022-07-23 · CP:Hurricanes 18+ 3.5:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adelia Piazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-07-09 · CP:Hurricanes 18+ 3.5:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adelia Piazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-06-04 · CP:Hurricanes 18+ 3.5:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allyson Wuensch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-02-27 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-02-13 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-02-06 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tasha Nagler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-01-23 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Vomacka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3
W
2021-12-12 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
L
2021-12-05 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cintia Shiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2021-11-21 · CP:Chelsea Hurricane:Raman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cintia Shiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 56.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer