← Search

Tiffany Harris

— year-end
68 matches · 40W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
Natalie Anderson / Wen Su
2026-09-02 · Weber/Farmington/FAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenna Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deric Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robbie Rutherford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Aguilar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyndsey Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Bright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Callie Brannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Thomas Madsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 61.3% of games
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 49.5% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.5% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.7% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert