← Search

Amy Zogleman

Fairway, KS
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 147W–54L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Zogleman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
2026-02-06 · Ohnemus, Thomas · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jan Claussen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-20 · McDermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · with Deborah Fabrizius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-13 · McDermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · with Josephine Cao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-14 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trina Kahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · Norman, Phyllis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Stahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-28 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Kuhlman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Colleen Allen / Marianna Coelho
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · with Carmen Kowalski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Lilana Spindler / Riki Sorenson
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · with Jackie Gehrke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
Kerstin Anderson / Kirsten Ruchaber
2025-10-24 · #4 Doubles · with Carmen Kowalski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-10-19 · Norman, Phyllis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Hambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-10-05 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Gehrke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-30 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Stahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 82.8% of games
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.2% of games
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 63% of games
4.0
79.3%
46W–12L · 64.3% of games
4.5
69.1%
67W–30L · 59.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
40 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer