← Search

Lara Maple

— year-end
248 matches · 150W–98L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Lara Maple to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history248 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Leslie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Throm, Bridget · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Curley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ganaden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
Lorrie Crossett / Julia Bush
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Gifford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
Sharon Anthamatten / Amanda Scroggs
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Valerie Marks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · Valdez, Kelli · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ganaden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-19 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Curley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Heineman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jackie Gehrke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Curley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alysen Abel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Teams65 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
75.3%
67W–22L · 59.1% of games
4.5
22.6%
7W–24L · 36.2% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.8% of games
9.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
67.9%
38W–18L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams