← Search

Lori Forsgren

— year-end
31 matches · 17W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lori Forsgren to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristy Harp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Neidecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-22 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeline Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-5
L
Glenna Gilliam / Jennifer Smith
2026-03-17 · Harp/Alma/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-10 · Harp/Alma/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Roffine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Megan Cooper / Erika Dougherty
2026-02-25 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Roffine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-12-08 · Mullens/VB/CM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nancy Kremers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-17 · Mullens/VB/CM · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Neidecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-05 · Mullens/VB/CM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Neidecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Jennifer Smith / Angelica Hernandez
2025-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Roffine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Wingfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.8% of games
3.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.2% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal