← Search

Jaime Simon

West Chester, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 113W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jaime Simon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-09-06 · Radley Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-0
L
2026-09-01 · Radley Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Radley Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Bendinelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Radley Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Eng Chung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Eng Chung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Kristy Harper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Netchix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Foga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Ina Fricchione championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Ina Fricchione championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Nicola Vansteenland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Netchix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Balcer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
63%
46W–27L · 55.4% of games
3.5
66.2%
47W–24L · 59% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#1 Singles
9%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert