← Search

Leslie Winters

— year-end
183 matches · 87W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Leslie Winters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history183 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Ball Whackers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · Ball Whackers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Foga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-04 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Gnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Dania Green / Michelle Smith
2026-05-28 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinali Jayanetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Valente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinali Jayanetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-19 · Smart Aces Spring · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56%
70W–55L · 53.2% of games
4.0
21.4%
9W–33L · 36.8% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams