Scott Phipps
232 matches · 161W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Scott Phipps to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history232 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams52 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 55.8% of games
3.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 57.5% of games
4.0
66.7%
40W–20L · 55% of games
4.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 43.3% of games
6.0
87.2%
34W–5L · 65.9% of games
7.0
76.1%
35W–11L · 60.3% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.