← Search

Allison Malesky

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 25W–7L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Allison Malesky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-08-17 · WP-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberlly Chhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · WP-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberlly Chhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Digan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · WP-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Warsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · WP-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rajshri Bolson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · WP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberlly Chhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · WP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Autumn Brockman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · WP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Benish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · WP YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tae Rice-Schlesinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · WP-O RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberlly Chhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-11 · WP-O RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberlly Chhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-27 · WP-O RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberlly Chhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 66.4% of games
3.0
75%
18W–6L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
19 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams