← Search

Cate Mettenburg

Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 10W–4L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cate Mettenburg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-08-01 · FC Advantage · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Grimsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · FC Advantage · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Datt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · FC Advantage · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Marazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Illona Beresford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Datt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-4
W
2024-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Shirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Shirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Demotte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Demotte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Shirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Georgeann Mercer / Jasmine Trouten
2023-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Illona Beresford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Shirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 93% of the time
#1 Doubles
93%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe