← Search

Andrea Keck

Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 81W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Keck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Glen Creek - Unfinished Business · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-02 · Glen Creek Vipers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika McElligott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-19 · Glen Creek Vipers · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Steel Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Digiacomo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · Glen Creek Vipers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Fell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Glen Creek Vipers · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-05-03 · Steel Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelina Simoni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · Crosstown Connection · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zachary Pivirotto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.4% of games
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 50.2% of games
4.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 36.9% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 56.1% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
15W–27L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams