← Search

Elizabeth McNany

Fayetteville, NY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 68W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth McNany to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-07 · Syracuse: Simpson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · Sabourin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brianna Laureti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · Sabourin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Tutor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · Sabourin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brianna Laureti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-23 · Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brianna Laureti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-02-16 · Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Leuenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-18 · Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Vacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-27 · Nelligan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nelligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-06-20 · Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Leuenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-0
W
2024-05-30 · Nelligan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brianna Laureti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.3% of games
3.5
88.1%
37W–5L · 64.6% of games
4.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
16%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal