← Search

Britta Janney

Henrico, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 8W–3L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Britta Janney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Ridgetop - Scammell · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Hutzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-09 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Lovette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Ridgetop - Scammell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Hutzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · 13 Westwood Gee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · Westwood Rodeo 3.0 Ley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirstine Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Westwood Rodeo 3.0 Ley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-04 · Westwood Rodeo 3.0 Ley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lexie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-08-16 · Ridgetop Scammell · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Hutzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-05-10 · WW Wetzel/Kirkeby · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Ley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-04-14 · Ridgetop Pugh 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nellie Blair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal