← Search

Sandra Park

— year-end
186 matches · 128W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sandra Park to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-08-25 · LOCH.Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · MD.Park · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-31 · Ci.Winzenz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Points
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · Ci.Winzenz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Spangenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · MD.Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigette Flower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · Ci.Winzenz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Spangenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Anna Jones / Vanese Clough
2026-07-09 · Ci.Winzenz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Spangenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · Ci.Winzenz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Spangenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · MD.Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Vinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · MD.Park · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merri Metcalf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-04 · Sa.Park40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 60.5% of games
3.5
80.4%
41W–10L · 61.8% of games
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.2% of games
5.5
100%
6W–0L · 75.3% of games
6.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 62.9% of games
7.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King