← Search

Allyson Schneider

Fuquay-Varina, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
466 matches · 292W–174L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Allyson Schneider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history466 matches
L
2026-09-11 · ACP.Nash · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrice Dovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6
L
2026-09-10 · PDovel-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Starritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · PDovel-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-28 · ACP.Nash · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Carla Sevilla / Melissa Phillips
2026-08-27 · PDovel-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · ACP.Nash · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Fish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · ACP.Nash · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · ACP.Rider · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Rider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · NMAC.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Monaghen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · Ma.Sredl18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Locklear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · NMAC.Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrice Dovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-24 · NMAC.Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrice Dovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.2% of games
3.5
70.9%
144W–59L · 58.1% of games
4.0
38.9%
21W–33L · 48.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
77.4%
24W–7L · 55.5% of games
7.5
60.6%
43W–28L · 53.5% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.8% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
103 matches
#1 Singles
22%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
91 matches
#2 Singles
8%
35 matches
#3 Singles
2%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe