← Search

Anne Farmer

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 50W–75L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anne Farmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-09-03 · TOC.Sager · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Alder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · TOC.Sager · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nelda VanAarde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-11 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Haney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-04 · TOC.Wilson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nelda VanAarde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Friddle · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Gallopo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · TOC.Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · TOC.Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Jezior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
L
2026-06-18 · TOC.Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Jezior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
40%
28W–42L · 47% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.3%
22W–30L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert