← Search

Lauren Redmond

— year-end
193 matches · 125W–68L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lauren Redmond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-09-09 · KEvans-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Ca.Schuch40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ana Maria Allessi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · La.Redmond18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Boney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Emily Johnson / Miho Ogura
2026-08-01 · Le.Barter18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenna Raynor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · Ca.Schuch40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-01 · Me.Golder18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Crabtree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Kelli Williams / Julie Lee
2026-06-25 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryanna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cooper Thornhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Ganon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Christina Jenkins / Emily Larson
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · with Traci Crabtree championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.7% of games
3.0
80.6%
25W–6L · 65.1% of games
3.5
58.3%
35W–25L · 56.1% of games
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 53.8% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 57.3% of games
6.5
71.1%
27W–11L · 53.3% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.6% of games
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
60 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal