← Search

Ana Maria Allessi

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 80W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ana Maria Allessi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Ca.Schuch40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marina Barthalmus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-10 · La.Redmond18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Traci Crabtree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Ca.Schuch40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Redmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · Je.Komes55C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacey Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Kivisto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Redmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossi Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · with Abigail Weaver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · An.Redmond40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-21 · Je.Komes55A3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Kearney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · Me.Kofod40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rossana Prevost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Tracy Owens / Stephanie Lee
2026-04-14 · Je.Komes55A3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Carley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
51.2%
44W–42L · 52.2% of games
3.5
30.3%
10W–23L · 46.5% of games
6.5
63%
17W–10L · 54.7% of games
3.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer