← Search

Jeff Berry

Stillwater, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 77W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-05-29 · Behemoth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · Behemoth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dar Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-13 · Behemoth · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fred Lueck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Behemoth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Eichman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-25 · Behemoth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Eichman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-25 · Team Beast +40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monty Mayfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-29 · Team Beast +40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-22 · Team Beast +40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-10-08 · Team Beast +40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Canaan Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-01 · Team Beast +40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-24 · Team Beast +40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-17 · Team Beast +40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.7% of games
4.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 53.8% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 72.1% of games
7.0
80%
32W–8L · 57.7% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert