← Search

Emily Keating

Ridgefield, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 84W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Keating to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-07-19 · 4S:Volley Girls:Margulies/East · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Margulies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · 4S:Volley Girls:Margulies/East · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Amadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · 4S:Volley Girls:Margulies/East · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · 4S:Volley Girls:Margulies/East · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-08 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Salley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-08 · MIL:Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Margulies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Margulies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-11 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Margulies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-23 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Margulies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-11-09 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-19 · 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/East · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
77.8%
56W–16L · 62.2% of games
4.0
61%
25W–16L · 53.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova