Jessie Chung
Ypsilanti, MI
132 matches · 69W–63L · seasons 2019–2024
Captains: add Jessie Chung to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history132 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Amy Kaufman / Lori Sella-Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2024
1VTC-inside-COOPER AD40&O WED 40 DW SEM F2
2CHIP-CLIFF AD40&O MO 35 NW SEM F4
3CHIP-CHUNG AD18&O WE 35 NW SEM F3
3CHIP-DOUGLASS COMBO W/E 7.5 MIXED SEM
3CHIP-GREEN AD55&O MO 80 AMW SEM F1
3CHIP-RUSCHE 18&O TU 40 NW SEM F2
3CHIP-RUSCHE AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F1
4LIB-KATAKOWSKI 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F1
7CHIP-SHAW JAN TRI-LEVEL 45 40 35 Women SEM
1CHIP-DOUGLASS Mixed 40&O 8.0 SEM F1
1CHIP-HERSEY 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F1
1CHIP-SHAW 7.5W COMBO SEM F2
1VTC-outside-HUTTON AD18&O MO 35NW SEM F3
3CHIP-BENOIT TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F1
3CHIP-CLIFF AD40&O 35NW WED SEM F3
3CHIP-DELANGE AD40&O 40NW TH SEM F2
3CHIP-DOUGLASS COMBO MIX 18&O 7.5 W/E SEM
3CHIP-GREEN AD55&O 80DW MO SEM F1
3HV-HUME SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 75 65 55 f2
4RCAA-SHAW MIX18&O 80 SEM F2
4VTC-REECE AD55&O 70DW TH SEM F2
6RCAA-SHAW-clay-dubs hard-sing AD18&O 40NW TU F3
1CHIP-CLIFF 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F3
1CHIP-DOUGLASS 7.5 Combo Mixed sat/sun SEM
1CHIP-DOUGLASS 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f1
2CHIP-VANDEWEGE W tri-level4.5, 4.0, 3.5 SEM F1
3CHIP-SHAW 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2
3CHIP-VOGLER 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F2
3LIB-HAESSLER D3 DAY W tri-level showdown SEM
3LIB-MARLEY 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f1
3RCAA-SHAW 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F2
4CHIP-CASWELL 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F4
1CHIP-3cts-CASWELL 35DW 18&O AD THURS SEM
1CHIP-SHAW 75 WW COMBO SEM F2
1LIB-outside-KORNFELD 6.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1
2CHIP-3cts-DODGE 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F1
4LIB-inside-MARLEY 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F2
7CHIP-3cts-CLIFF 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F1
MW SEM LIB-MARLEY 65WW COMBO SEM F2
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 80.8% of games
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.9% of games
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 52.8% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 41.9% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.7% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.