← Search

Anne Bushroe

Clarkston, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 105W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Bushroe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-07-15 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Wachowicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-08 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nikole Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Deisinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-01 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristina Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Mengyan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Deisinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Frantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-10 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristina Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jori Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ty Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · DEER-Mengyan Tri MED Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Friesen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · DEER-Mengyan Tri MED Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin DuFresne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
83.6%
56W–11L · 63.1% of games
4.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 44.4% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 57.2% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.5% of games
8.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#1 Singles
9%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams