← Search

Julie Walker

— year-end
23 matches · 10W–13L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Julie Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · PC MARC-Alexander/Weise · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · PC MARC-Alexander/Weise · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-21 · PC MARC-Alexander/Weise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-05-09 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-02 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-04-15 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-04-08 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Siegal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-12 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yocum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Lynne Anderson / Cathy Siegal
2023-06-05 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-08 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 50.2% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#1 Singles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert