← Search

Lauren Behm

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 122W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lauren Behm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-08-29 · RRTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Jenkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-23 · RRTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Jenkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-20 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Klaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Sarah Turner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Turner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Turner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Bell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Turner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-13 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · RRTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Abrams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · RRTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Corey Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Abrams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
100%
9W–0L · 71.1% of games
2.5
52%
13W–12L · 49.9% of games
3.0
88.6%
31W–4L · 66.2% of games
3.5
100%
25W–0L · 70.8% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
79.2%
19W–5L · 61.6% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer