← Search

Elizabeth Neighbors

FRANKLIN, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 60W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Neighbors to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Kumar/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Kumar/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kerry Elam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-08-26 · Kumar/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Protz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · Kumar/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marian Vangeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Devin Haneline / Jennifer Price
2026-06-27 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Fogarty mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-20 · Kumar/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anuragh Mudakatte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Debora Edkin / Jessica Davis
2026-06-11 · Let’s Talk About Sets! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clair Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Let’s Talk About Sets! · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Neeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Fran Studdard / Leanna Wright
2026-05-17 · Lindsay/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Lindsay/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Radig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clair Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 56.9% of games
3.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.9% of games
3.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 57.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert