← Search

Anne Liivak

FALMOUTH, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 37W–39L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Anne Liivak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2025-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Seligman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jess Vamvas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Barbara Wilson / Riva Olsen
2025-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Nanci Levine / Linda Hayes
2024-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
L
Susan Evans / Renee Mancuso
2024-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca DePorte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 62.5% of games
3.0
44.8%
26W–32L · 47.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer