← Search

Jessica Rieder

MASSILLON, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 29W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Rieder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
Carlie Eisenbrei / Christine Stokes
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W NC1 Trent · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Geinzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W NC1 Trent · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W NC1 Trent · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Desiree' Dowd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-11-02 · C 6.5W NC1 Preston · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Houston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2024-10-13 · C 6.5W NC1 Preston · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Kurtz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Amy Smith / Kristin Zalenski
2024-09-20 · C 6.5W NC1 Preston · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Rich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-07-10 · OH NEO A40 3.0W Bailey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Kilkenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Angela Smith / Rachel Brahler
2024-07-08 · A18 3.0W NC Blake · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-19 · OH NEO A40 3.0W Bailey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Zaher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-06-17 · A18 3.0W NC Blake · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Damrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-12 · OH NEO A40 3.0W Bailey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Zaher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-06-05 · OH NEO A40 3.0W Bailey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Kilkenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 55% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#1 Singles
21%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert