← Search

Jenah Bartek

Dayton, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 108W–166L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jenah Bartek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
W
2026-07-12 · KTC-Hudson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Gill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-12 · KTC Trubee · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · KTC Linhardt · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-08 · KTC Trubee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Goel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-12-08 · KTC Elsass · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-06 · KTC Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbie Grube
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-01 · KTC Trubee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Menningmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-11-23 · KTC Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Goel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-11-17 · KTC Trubee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-09 · KTC Linhardt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Akemon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-08 · KTC Elsass · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Loeffelholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-11-03 · KTC Trubee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Menningmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 58.4% of games
3.0
40.5%
30W–44L · 46.1% of games
3.5
34.3%
35W–67L · 43.3% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 41.7% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
66 matches
#1 Singles
22%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
41 matches
#2 Singles
8%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert