← Search

Shanelle Witting

— year-end
251 matches · 155W–96L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Shanelle Witting to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history251 matches
W
2026-08-23 · QRRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-23 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Hawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · KTC-Witting · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meryl Hattenbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · KTC-Witting · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Bleidorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Georgianne Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Cooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-06 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · KTC-Witting · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Duch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · KTC-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · QRRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Tricia Fahrenholz / Christy Smith
2026-05-23 · KTC-Smallwood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Loeffelholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams73 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 55.6% of games
3.5
67%
77W–38L · 56.6% of games
4.0
38.8%
19W–30L · 41.9% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.9% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.5% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.1% of games
7.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
36 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams