← Search

Simon Brooks

— year-end
42 matches · 22W–20L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Simon Brooks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Fahnestock-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trey Lingo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · Simmons-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Dominic Vero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Simmons-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerry Philip Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
David Mann / Neil Desai
2026-04-23 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-21 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paul Fahnestock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-07 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paul Fahnestock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · CORTA/Neil Desai · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-16 · CORTA/Neil Desai · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-12-13 · CORTA/Matt Edmonson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alix Toelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-17 · CORTA/Matt Edmonson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alix Toelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · Desai-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Fahnestock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 50.7% of games
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 69.2% of games
4.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 36.2% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova