← Search

Paul Fahnestock

— year-end
61 matches · 40W–21L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Paul Fahnestock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Cavanaugh-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Chancey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · Fahnestock-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Cavanaugh-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reed Bickerstaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
David Mann / Alonso Trevizo
2026-09-01 · Cavanaugh-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Chancey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-05 · Simmons-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerry Philip Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Simmons-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaiden Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Simmons-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaiden Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
L
2026-07-18 · Simmons-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Kennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Simmons-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaiden Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Simon Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-09 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Trey Lingo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · Edmonson-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Simon Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.7% of games
3.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 63.5% of games
4.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.7% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams