← Search

Patrick Howard

— year-end
134 matches · 83W–51L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Patrick Howard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Sabo-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Felix Rijos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Kennington-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Medders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · Kennington-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamario Mullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Chavez-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rourke Stay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Rantz Walters / Sun Kim
2026-08-15 · Mardis-CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ken Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · McKenzie-CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Chavez-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ross White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-3
L
Joshua Reynolds / David Mann
2026-08-02 · Chavez-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nishant de Quadros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · Chavez-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ross White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · McKenzie-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Galbraith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · Williams · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with David McGuirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Michael Lynch / William Brown
2026-07-11 · Mardis-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Terrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Teams55 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.6% of games
3.0
80.8%
42W–10L · 61.5% of games
3.5
47.4%
27W–30L · 49.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.2% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova