← Search

Susan Sandhu

— year-end
127 matches · 66W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Sandhu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-11 · QRRC-Linhardt · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Jarosik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · QRRC-Linhardt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · QRRC-Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Vitale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · QRRC-Linhardt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · QRRC-Linhardt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · KTC-Sandhu · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-22 · KTC-Sandhu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Sumner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-21 · KTC-Elsass · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zina Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Tricia Fahrenholz / Mary Miller
2026-03-14 · KTC-Sandhu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zina Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · KTC-Sandhu · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Trombetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · KTC-Elsass · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-18 · KTC-Elsass · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Schuering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.3% of games
3.0
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.3% of games
3.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 49.3% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.4% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert