← Search

Melissa Coward

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 146W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Melissa Coward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
W
2026-09-02 · LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Magee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · LKulp.7.5C-SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Flodin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · LKulp-SVC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Kulp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · AWestrick-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · LKulp-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Hammett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · AWestrick-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Drew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · LKulp-SVC · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-13 · LKulp-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Sudzina Schut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · LKulp-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Sudzina Schut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.3%
29W–5L · 70% of games
3.5
66.7%
42W–21L · 58.1% of games
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 47.9% of games
5.5
94.1%
16W–1L · 72.1% of games
6.5
63%
17W–10L · 54.9% of games
7.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.4% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.7% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Singles
10%
21 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe