← Search

Megan Chiles

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 155W–47L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Megan Chiles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
W
2026-09-10 · KLaan-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Miho Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · KLaan-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Kabat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · BGooch-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Chiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Hillary Mulder / David Pierce
2026-07-16 · BGooch-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Chiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · BGooch-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Chiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-18 · BShane-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Scherr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · BShane-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tess Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · MLong4.0-SVC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · BShane-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tess Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · BShane-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tess Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-25 · MLong4.0-SVC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-18 · MLong4.0-SVC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
95.7%
22W–1L · 76% of games
3.5
94.2%
49W–3L · 72.2% of games
4.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 55% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 62% of games
7.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 54% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.4% of games
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 71.5% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
34 matches
#2 Singles
13%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
23 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King