← Search

Deanna Lape

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 142W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deanna Lape to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
L
2026-09-09 · KEvans-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lexi Yakoobian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-02 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amber Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-20 · KEvans-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kyra Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-19 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amelia Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-18 · SStowe-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Moy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Heather Herndon / Sophia Herndon
2026-07-14 · SStowe-SVC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Weinberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · Lo.Jensen18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Lape mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-4
W
2026-06-24 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Lexi Yakoobian
2026-06-17 · MLong-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · Lo.Jensen18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Lape mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · SStowe-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Moy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · SStowe-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Moy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.5% of games
3.5
70.2%
80W–34L · 57.7% of games
4.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 39% of games
6.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 58.6% of games
7.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 49.5% of games
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#3 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King