← Search

Eve Elden

Gaylord, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 45W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eve Elden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Fender championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia van Maanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia van Maanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Hilary Gessner / Barbara Brown
2026-05-17 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Fender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-16 · Team Kaufman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Babe Toteff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Michelle Moore / Christina Marbury
2026-04-26 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Kristin Miller
2026-04-25 · Team Kaufman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-25 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn O'Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-13 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia van Maanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Deborah Miller / Lucia Elden
2025-07-12 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia van Maanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Constanza Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 71% of games
3.5
50%
23W–23L · 50.9% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 43.8% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Singles
24%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#2 Singles
17%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe