← Search

Sandra Martinez Avalos

Shelby Township, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 62W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandra Martinez Avalos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Nicole Baker
2026-05-20 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-09 · 6WESS-LI 35NW WE 18&O SEM F5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-18 · 6WESS-LI 35NW WE 18&O SEM F5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-04 · 6WESS-LI 35NW WE 18&O SEM F5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Natalie Brandt / Tara Sherman
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · with Claudia Langsdorf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.8% of games
3.5
75.7%
28W–9L · 59% of games
6.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 61.1% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
39 matches
#2 Singles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert