← Search

Colleen ONeal

Zionsville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 208W–97L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Colleen ONeal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history305 matches
W
2026-09-02 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Henry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-21 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Lew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
Catherine Miller / Taylor Kinney
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Fulling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Moschel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · High Tri W IHP Hullett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-08-03 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emeline Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Lew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Noe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Michelle Dudash / Anne Barnes
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Barrett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorrie Pavlack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Lisa Martin
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Barrett · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55% of games
4.0
83%
73W–15L · 62.1% of games
4.5
51.6%
32W–30L · 51.5% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 62.5% of games
8.0
65%
13W–7L · 59.1% of games
8.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 60.7% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
8.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.2% of games
8.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.5% of games
9.0mixed
64.3%
18W–10L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
78 matches
#1 Singles
22%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
50 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer