← Search

Emily Kasper

Oklahoma City, OK
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 20W–12L · seasons 2020–2023

Captains: add Emily Kasper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2023-06-16 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Kasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2023-05-30 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Kasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-05-16 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Kasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2023-05-09 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Kasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-04-21 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Pyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-04-18 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-04-11 · Sugar and Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Kasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-06-07 · Get A Grip//OKC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Merritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2022-05-31 · Get A Grip//OKC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-05-10 · Get A Grip//OKC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Kasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-05-03 · Get A Grip//OKC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-04-26 · Get A Grip//OKC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 62.9% of games
3.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#2 Singles
19%
6 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer