← Search

Shannon Matuska

Wolverine Lake, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 75W–88L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Shannon Matuska to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-08-31 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jon Yongjun Ren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joel Cronenwett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jon Yongjun Ren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Koji Yanagisawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · FAC-Nix 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvette Diamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yuji Shimizu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · FAC-Nix 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · FAC-Nix 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 59% of games
3.5
32.8%
22W–45L · 44.1% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.5% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.6% of games
6.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.1% of games
7.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.5% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#2 Singles
14%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova