← Search

Calla Whipp

Des Moines, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 41W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Calla Whipp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-05-16 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Ver Steeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · Whipp · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Fisher Jr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · Whipp · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Fisher Jr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · Whipp · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nathan Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-31 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · Shipp & Pham: Life Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-12-12 · Whipp/Pham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Pedro Gonzalez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-16 · Whipp/Pham · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Sylvester mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-10-10 · Whipp/Pham · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Wingert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-21 · Shortenhaus & Ditsworth - Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Upright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-07-16 · Shortenhaus & Ditsworth - Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Upright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-04 · Shortenhaus & Ditsworth - Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Upright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 55.9% of games
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 48.6% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.6% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.6% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Singles
23%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova