← Search

Brandon Willett

Des Moines, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 75W–52L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brandon Willett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Rickert: Valley Southwoods · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Whipps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Rickert: Valley Southwoods · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Fautsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Stroede, John · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-21 · Stroede, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Stroede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · Heil/Hanson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Ver Steeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Keshwani & Tekippe: LifeTime · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Danenhauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Pham/Whipp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Reis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · Keshwani & Tekippe: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Leech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · Keshwani & Tekippe: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Leech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · HOA/Stroede/40&over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-22 · Heil/Hanson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Ver Steeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-08 · Pham/Whipp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Reis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams93 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games
4.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 49.2% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 37.6% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
25W–5L · 58.6% of games
9.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova