← Search

Kory Fasing

Englewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 69W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kory Fasing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-08-25 · GCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · GCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bill Flecky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · GCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Steelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mary Murray / Lindsey Reisbeck
2026-07-07 · GCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-02 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · GCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · GCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · GCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.8%
61W–29L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.3% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert