← Search

Jennifer Steelman

ENGLEWOOD, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 60W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Steelman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-07-23 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · GCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kory Fasing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · GCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Carreira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diedre Wooden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · GCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · GCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · GCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-05-12 · GCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Elodie de Fabrique / Victoria Burgess
2026-05-07 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Therese Eisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · GCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · GCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 63.5% of games
4.0
59.5%
47W–32L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert