← Search

Betsy Phillips

ENGLEWOOD, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 53W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Betsy Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-18 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jami Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Belitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · GCC GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · GCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · GCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kory Fasing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · GCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jami Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jami Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-22 · GCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · GCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Belitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · GCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Belitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-06 · GCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
58.9%
53W–37L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova