← Search

Cathy Thomas

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 55W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Cathy Thomas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-07-13 · MLF RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Vizena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with SeonAh Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · MLF RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Annette Vizena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Sharon Day / Julie Schoenfeld
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Soffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Annette Vizena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · MLF RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaime Donnelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittney Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · MLF RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-18 · MLF PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · MLF PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Vizena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-04 · MLF PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Vizena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 55% of games
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 80.2% of games
4.0
71.4%
35W–14L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Singles
14%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer