← Search

Alix Hoekzema

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 41W–35L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Alix Hoekzema to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
Emily Jenkins / Kristin Thompson
2026-05-01 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Erin McGraw / Suzanne Smith
2026-04-24 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Feasel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · with Mara Ackermann Ziminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-03 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · with Danielle Scheschuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Midge Taylor / Susan Parsons
2026-02-27 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Feasel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-2
W
2026-02-13 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Verbic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-30 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-01-23 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Dippolito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-12-19 · Racquet Club 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara Ackermann Ziminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Sarah Edwards
2025-12-05 · Racquet Club 5 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-14 · Racquet Club 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte Beran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-11 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte Beran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
18W–6L · 59.1% of games
3.0
42.5%
17W–23L · 44.2% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 50.7% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams