← Search

Sarah Feasel

— year-end
69 matches · 34W–35L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Sarah Feasel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
Molly Philipps / Amy Young
2026-09-11 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Matsanoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Upp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-06 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Martie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Sirak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Erin McGraw / Suzanne Smith
2026-04-24 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alix Hoekzema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Martie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-14 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-16 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Sirak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
Alison Staloch / Anjali Chavan
2026-03-08 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Gurwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Ryzenman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Midge Taylor / Susan Parsons
2026-02-27 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alix Hoekzema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-2
Teams18 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
55%
11W–9L · 51.7% of games
3.0
36.1%
13W–23L · 43.5% of games
5.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams