← Search

Melinda Reinicker

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 98W–59L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Melinda Reinicker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-08-10 · MCP.Reinicker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · TOC.Allen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · MCP.Reinicker · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · TOC.Klein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aaron Reinicker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · TOC.Allen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · TOC.Klein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aaron Reinicker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · TOC.Allen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Kiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · PW.Short · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · PW.Short · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · TOC.Allen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Rebecca Jones / Elise Hamilton
2026-03-21 · TOC.Allen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · PW.Short · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.4% of games
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 65.9% of games
3.5
59%
23W–16L · 54.9% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.3% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 67.4% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.4% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#1 Singles
20%
32 matches
#2 Singles
15%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
22 matches
#3 Singles
9%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer